O’Doherty asked, “as to why performed he claim that?
Performed the guy really accept it? Think about his personal items, and you may items he or she is? Its artistic ‘quality’ often negligible, but they shine on the light away from converging information and you can mythology.” six He had been calculated to deny Duchamp’s declaration.
Brian O’Doherty, Portrait away from p, direct step one, slow pulse, 1966. Timber, cup, Liquitex, system, 17 x 17 x 8 ins.
However, I significantly believe in the efficacy of art and i profoundly believe in the brand new hazardous character regarding ways
One other came to be out of Thomas B. Hess’s horrible attack (masked by thinly veiled guise off neutrality) with the Duchamp, throughout the article “J’Accuse p,” published throughout the p “disastrously provides confused artwork that have life … He has tried to change himself towards a work of art, and you will thanks to their analogy, has been a great corruptor away from young people.” 7 A third parts desires to meet the requirements also, and that’s O’Doherty’s education as the a medical doctor, hence predates his best industry choices once the artist, critic, and you may arts officer. 8 Wisdom into the relationship in his mind from mutual transfers between artwork and you can technology was basically revealed during the an effective lecture, “This new Government and you can Looks out-of Cardiovascular system Transplants,” given to the brand new College University Dublin Scientific Area, three years following end of your own “Portrait” show. Read more